차곡 문형첩

No. 009 · 2026.09.07 Mon

문형 해설

PATTERNS
TOPIK 1-2

A-(으)ㄴ가요?

Is it…? — a softened way of asking

A question about a state or a quality, gentler than -아요/어요? and leaving the other person room to answer. English has no single ending that does this, so the softening has to come from the phrasing: not “Is it expensive?” but “Would it be on the expensive side?” You are testing the water rather than demanding an answer. Common when checking conditions with someone you do not know well.

접속 conjugation
  • Adjective stems ending in a vowel or ㄹ take -ㄴ가요?: 비싸다 → 비싼가요? / 길다 → 긴가요?
  • Stems ending in a consonant take -은가요?: 좋다 → 좋은가요? / 많다 → 많은가요?
  • 이다 and 아니다 become -인가요? and 아닌가요?; for honorifics insert -(으)시-: 바쁘시다 → 바쁘신가요?
이 조건이면 납기가 너무 촉박한가요?
On these terms, would the deadline be too tight?

Verbs never take this form — they use -나요?: 가다 → 가나요? (✗ 간가요?). 있다 and 없다 pattern with verbs: 있나요?, 없나요?

TOPIK 3-4

N에 의하면

according to…

Names where a piece of information came from — the news, a forecast, a survey, a regulation, something someone said. The point is that you are passing it on rather than vouching for it, so the sentence normally ends in a reported form. Slightly more formal than -에 따르면, and common in reports and official documents.

접속 conjugation
  • Attaches straight to a noun, with no vowel/consonant split: 뉴스에 의하면 / 통계 자료에 의하면
  • The sentence usually closes in a reported form: 일기예보에 의하면 내일 비가 온다고 합니다
  • When quoting a person, attach 말 rather than the person: 그 사람의 말에 의하면
업계 조사에 의하면 올해 보험료가 더 오를 거라고 합니다.
According to an industry survey, insurance premiums will rise again this year.

Ending flatly sounds wrong: 일기예보에 의하면 내일 비가 와요 (△) makes it sound as though you are guaranteeing the rain. Say 온다고 해요 to keep it someone else's claim.

TOPIK 5-6

N(으)로 보다

judging by…, from the standpoint of…

Sets out the basis for a judgement first — price, ability, time, circumstances — then delivers the verdict from that angle. In practice it almost never appears in its plain form; you meet it as -(으)로 볼 때, -(으)로 보면 or -(으)로 봐서. A staple of formal speech and written reports.

접속 conjugation
  • Nouns ending in a vowel or ㄹ take 로, those ending in a consonant take 으로: 결과로 보면 / 실력으로 보면
  • The usual shapes are -(으)로 볼 때, -(으)로 보면, -(으)로 봐서; written Korean also has -(으)로 보아
  • What follows has to be a judgement or an assessment, not a plain statement of fact
지금까지 보유한 자료로 볼 때 보조금 신청은 무리가 없어 보입니다.
Judging by the material we hold so far, the subsidy application should be straightforward.

Note the division of labour with pattern two: -(으)로 보다 is you judging from that angle, -에 의하면 is you relaying what someone else said. 조사 결과로 볼 때 인상 폭이 큽니다 (your judgement) / 조사 결과에 의하면 인상 폭이 크다고 합니다 (what the survey says).

비즈니스 회화

BUSINESS

추가 요구와 범위 조정 Extra requests and adjusting the scope——An insurance-finance system is halfway through development when Section Chief Seo, on the client side, asks to add pension and premium calculators. Assistant Manager Nam, on the vendor side, spells out what is feasible with the people and the contract they have, and what it would cost. They settle on building the pension feature first.서 과장=Section Chief Seo (client side) / 남 대리=Assistant Manager Nam (vendor side)

서 과장남 대리님, 이번 범위에 연금하고 보험료 산정 기능을 넣고 싶은데요. 지금 일정으로는 많이 빠듯한가요?
Mr. Nam, we'd like to add the pension and insurance premium calculators to this scope. Would that be very tight on the current schedule?
남 대리솔직히 말씀드리면 빠듯합니다. 지금 보유한 인력으로는 두 기능을 동시에 개발하기 어렵습니다.
Honestly, it would be tight. With the staff we currently have, we can't develop both features at once.
서 과장인력을 더 투입하면 가능할까요?
Would it be possible if we put more people on it?
남 대리가능은 합니다. 다만 계약서에 의하면 범위가 바뀌면 견적을 다시 산정하게 되어 있습니다.
It would be possible. But according to the contract, a change of scope means the quote has to be recalculated.
서 과장추가 비용이 얼마나 되는지 먼저 알아야 내부 결재를 올릴 수 있을 것 같아요.
I need to know roughly what the extra cost is before I can put it through internal approval.
남 대리두 기능을 다 넣으면 막대한 시간과 비용이 들어가서, 한 번에 목돈이 나갑니다.
Putting both in takes an enormous amount of time and money, so it would mean a large sum going out all at once.
서 과장그럼 보조금 심사 일정으로 볼 때, 연금 기능만 먼저 넣는 게 낫겠네요.
Then judging by the subsidy review schedule, it'd be better to put in just the pension feature first.
남 대리저도 그게 안전하다고 봅니다. 오늘 중으로 범위를 줄인 견적을 다시 보내 드리겠습니다.
I think that's the safer option too. I'll send you a revised quote with the reduced scope by the end of today.